Laboratory Study of Young Modulus of Granular Soils Using Cyclic Triaxial Test with Local Strain Measurement

Document Type : Research Note

Author

Assistant professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran

Abstract

Young's modulus (E) is one of the important parameters in soil mechanics that is commonly used in geotechnical projects. This parameter is very important because it directly indicates the hardness of the material. Elastic constants (Young's modulus and Poisson's ratio (ν)) are used as the main parameters of soil mechanical properties for the analysis and design in construction projects. Two common methods for extracting the Young's modulus of soil materials are the static method and the dynamic method. In the static method, the Young's modulus (E50), which is usually obtained from the stress-strain curve in element tests such as the triaxial test. The dynamic elastic modulus (Ed) can be obtained by measuring the compressional wave velocity (Vp) in situ wave propagation experiments or by using bender element in element tests. In this study, using a triaxial device, Young's modulus over a wide range of strains have been studied. The effect of grading characteristics such as gravel content, anisotropic consolidation, sample preparation method, confining stress and relative density on the Young's modulus of granular soil has been evaluated. Using local strain measurements, the Young's modulus of granular materials is investigated. In conventional triaxial machines, load plate errors and system capability effects usually limit shear strain measurements to values greater than 0.01%, although local strain measurements can be used to make accurate measurements. The materials used in the present study were 161 Firoozkooh silica sand and Mesutak gravel. Firoozkooh sand 161 has a golden yellow color and has a uniform granulation. The reconstructed specimens in this study are mainly based on the wet tamping (WT) method. It is noteworthy that in order to evaluate the fabrication method in the last stage, two samples with water deposition (WP) method and air deposition or dry precipitation (AP) method have also been studied. The results show that the Young's modulus increases at small strain levels with the addition of gravel to the host sand at a certain stress level and relative density, but its effect at large strain levels is almost negligible. On the other hand, as the confining stress increases, the effect of gravel content on the Young's modulus decreases. The results show that the Young's modulus has an increasing trend with increasing confining stress or relative density. At small strain levels, sand mixed with 50% gravel has the highest Young's modulus. The results related to the studied sand show that in this particular type of sand, sand mixed with 50% gravel has the highest degradation in hardness. This indicates that in this amount of sand, the combination of sand and gravel is such that the most slippage or rolling occurs between the grains, which further reduces the hardness. The reason for this is due to the special arrangement of sand grains in samples containing 50% gravel. In fact, in 50% gravel samples, the grains of sand are placed between the grains of sand like tiny balls, and the application of force causes the grains of sand to move and slip. Also, the results of anisotropic tests show that in the consolidated specimens under anisotropic consolidation, the Young's modulus increases with increasing the initial deviatoric stress compared to the consolidated specimens in the isotropic condition. The results show that different methods of samples preparation have a significant effect on Young's modulus.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. Wichtmann, T. and Triantafyllidis, T. (2009) On the correlation of “static” and “dynamic” stiffness moduli of non-cohesive soils. Bautechnik, 86(1), 28-39.
  2. Asef, M.R. and Farrokhrouz, M. (2017) A semi-empirical relation between static and dynamic elastic modulus. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 157, 359-363.
  3. Wichtmann, T., Kimmig, I., and Triantafyllidis, T. (2017) On correlations between “dynamic” (small-strain) and “static” (large-strain) stiffness moduli – An experimental investigation on 19 sands and gravels. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 98, 72-83.
  4. Camacho-Tauta, J. (2013) Shear modulus reduction curves of Guayuriba sands by cyclic triaxial and bender element tests. Third International Conference on Geotechnique, Construction Materials and Environment, Nagoya, Japan, 3-9.
  5. Cai, Y., Dong, Q., Wang, J., Gu, C., and Xu, C. (2015) Measurement of small strain shear modulus of clean and natural sands in saturated condition using bender element test. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 76, 100-110.
  6. Kawaguchi, T., Mitachi, T., Shibuya, S., and Sano, Y. (2001) Evaluation of elastic shear modulus G in laboratory bender element test. Doboku Gakkai Ronbunshu, 1(694), 195-207.
  7. Camacho-Tauta, J.F., Reyes-Ortiz, O.J., and Álvarez, J.D.J. (2013) Comparison between resonant-column and bender element tests on three types of soils. Dyna (Colombia), 80(182), 163-172.
  8. Madhusudhan, B.N. and Senetakis, K. (2016) Evaluating use of resonant column in flexural mode for dynamic characterization of Bangalore sand. Soils and Foundations, 56(3), 574-580.
  9. Souto, A., Hartikainen, J., and Özüdoğru, K. (1994) Measurement of dynamic parameters of road pavement materials by the bender element and resonant column tests. Geotechnique, 44(3), 519-526.
  10. Cabalar, A.F. (2010) Applications of the oedometer, triaxial and resonant column tests to the study of micaceous sands. Engineering Geology, 112(1–4), 21-28.
  11. Cherian, A.C. and Kumar, J. (2016) Effects of vibration cycles on shear modulus and damping of sand using resonant column tests. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 142(12), 1-6.
  12. Moayerian, S. (2012) Effect of Loading Frequency on Dynamic Properties of Soils Using Resonant Column. Civil Engineering (Master's thesis, University of Waterloo).
  13. Goudarzy, M., Rahman, M.M., König, D., and Schanz, T. (2016) Influence of non-plastic fines content on maximum shear modulus of granular materials. Soils and Foundations, 56(6), 973-983.
  14. Goudarzy, M., Rahemi, N., Rahman, M.M., and Schanz, T. (2017) Predicting the maximum shear modulus of sands containing nonplastic fines. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 143(9), 06017013.
  15. Chien, L.K. and Oh, Y.N. (2002) Influence of fines content and initial shear stress on dynamic properties of hydraulic reclaimed soil. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 39(1), 242-253.
  16. Zhu, S., Yang, G., Wen, Y., and Ou, L. (2014) Dynamic shear modulus reduction and damping under high confining pressures for gravels. Geotechnique Letters, 4, 179-186.
  17. Biglari, M. and Ashayeri, I. (2012) An empirical model for shear modulus and damping ratio of unsaturated soils. 5th Asia-Pacific Conference on Unsaturated Soils, 2(Cl), 499-503.
  18. Kallioglou, P., Tika, T., Koninis, G., Papadopoulos, S., and Pitilakis, K. (2009) Shear modulus and damping ratio of organic soils. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 27(2), 217-235.
  19. Maher, M.H., Ro, K.S., and Welsh, J.P. (1994) High strain dynamic modulus and damping of chemically grouted sand. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 13(2), 131-138.
  20. Zhang, J., Andrus, R.D., and Juang, C.H. (2005) Normalized shear modulus and material damping ratio relationships. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 131(4), 453-464.
  21. Ishihara, K. (1997) Soil Behaviour in Earthquake Geotechnics. Clarendon Press.
  22. Atkinson, J.H., Coop, M.R., Stallebrass, S.E., and Viggiani., G. (1993) Measurement of stiffness of soils and weak rocks in laboratory tests. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, 30(5), 277.
  23. Enomoto, T. (2016) Effects of grading and particle characteristics on small strain properties of granular materials. Soils and Foundations, 56(4), 745-750.
  24. Seed, H.B., Wong, R.T., Idriss, I.M., and Tokimatsu, K. (1986) Moduli and damping factors for dynamic analyses of cohesionless soils. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 112(11), 1016–1032.
  25. Kokusho, T. (1980) Cyclic Triaxial Test of Dynamic Soil Properties for Wide Strain Range. Soils and Foundations, 20(2), 45-60.
  26. Tanaka, Y., Kudo, K., Yoshida, Y., and Ikemi, M. (1987) A study on the mechanical properties of sandy gravel-dynamica properties of reconstituted sample. Report of Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry.
  27. Hardin, B. (1973) Shear Modulus of Gravels. Report TR74-73- CE19, Civil Engineering Department, University of Kentucky.
  28. Lin, S.-Y., Lin, P.S., Luo, H.-S., and Juang, C.H. (2000) Shear modulus and damping ratio characteristics of gravelly deposits. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 37(3), 638-651.
  29. Cuccovillo, T. and Coop, M.R. (1997) The measurement of local axial strains in triaxial tests using LVDTs. Geotechnique, 47(1), 167-171.
  30. De Gennaro, V., Canou, J., Dupla, J.C., and Benahmed, N. (2004) Influence of loading path on the undrained behaviour of a medium loose sand. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 41(1), 166-180.
  31. Wichtmann, T., Niemunis, A., and Triantafyllidis, T. (2007) On the influence of the polarization and the shape of the strain loop on strain accumulation in sand under high-cyclic loading. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 27(1), 14-28.
  32. Finge, Z., Doanh, T., and Dubujet, P. (2006) Undrained anisotropy of Hostun RF loose sand: New experimental investigations. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 43(11), 1195-1212.
  33. Sivathayalan, S. and Vaid, Y.P. (2002) Influence of generalized initial state and principal stress rotation on the undrained response of sands. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 39(1), 63-76.
  34. Benahmed, N. (2001) Comportement Mécanique D’un Sable Sous Cisaillement Monotone Et Cyclique. Ph.D. Dissertation, Ecole Nationale des Ponts et Chaussées, Paris.
  35. Uthayakumar, M. and Vaid, Y.P. (1998) Static liquefaction of sands under multiaxial loading. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 35(2), 273-283.
  36. Vaid, Y.P., Chung, E.K.F., and Kuerbis, R.H. (1990) Stress path and steady state. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 27(1), 1-7.
  37. Zhou, W., Chen, Y., Ma, G., Yang, L., and Chang, X. (2017) A modified dynamic shear modulus model for rockfill materials under a wide range of shear strain amplitudes. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 92, 229-238.
  38. Stahl, M. and Konietzky, H. (2011) Discrete element simulation of ballast and gravel under special consideration of grain-shape, grain-size and relative density. Granular Matter, 13(4), 417-428.
  39. Wang, Y.H. and Mok, C.B. (2008) Mechanisms of small-strain shear-modulus anisotropy in soils. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 134(10), 1516-1530.
  40. Yamamuro, J.A., Wood, F.M., and Lade, P. V. (2008) Effect of depositional method on the microstructure of silty sand. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 45(11), 1538-1555.
  41. Yamashita, S., Hori, T., and Suzuki, T. (2005) Effects of initial and induced anisotropy on initial stiffness of sand by triaxial and bender elements tests. Geomechanics: Testing, modeling, and simulation, 350-369.
  42. Burland, J.B. and Symes, M. (1982) A simple axial displacement gauge for use in the triaxial apparatus. Geotechnique, 32(1), 62-65.
  43. Scholey, G.K., Frost, J.D., Lo Presti, D.C.F., and Jamiolkowskt, M. (1995) A review of instrumentation for measuring small strains during triaxial testing of soil specimens. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 18(2), 137-156.
  44. Clayton, C.R.I., Khatrush, S.A., Bica, A. V.D., and Siddique, A. (1990) Discussion on “the use of hall effect semiconductors in geotechnical instrumentation.” Geotechnical Testing Journal, 13(1), 63-67.
  45. ASTM D4254 (2006) Standard test methods for minimum index density and unit weight of soils and calculation of relative density. ASTM International.
  46. ASTM D 4253 (2013) Standard test methods for maximum index density and unit weight of soils using a vibratory table. ASTM International.
  47. Borhani, A. and Fakharian, K. (2016) Effect of particle shape on dilative behavior and stress path characteristics of Chamkhaleh sand in undrained triaxial tests. International Journal of Civil Engineering, 14(4), 197-208.
  48. Selig, E. and Ladd, R (1978) Preparing test specimens using undercompaction. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 1(1), 16.
  49. ASTM D 4767 (2011). Standard test method for consolidated undrained triaxial compression test for cohesive soils. ASTM International.
  50. ASTM (2013) Standard test methods for the determination of the modulus and damping properties of soils using the cyclic triaxial apparatus. ASTM International.
  51. Yasuda, Y., Matsumoto, N., Yoshioka, R., and Takahashi, M. (1997) Undrained monotonic and cyclic strength of compacted rockfill material from triaxial and torsional simple shear tests. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 34(3), 357-367.
  52. Kumar, S.S., Krishna, A.M., and Dey, A. (2017) Evaluation of dynamic properties of sandy soil at high cyclic strains. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 99(May), 157-167.
  53. Ghodrati, A. and Araei, A.A. (2017) Artificial neural networks for modeling shear modulus and damping behavior of gravelly materials. International Journal of Geomechanics, 17(2), 4016060.
  54. Yamada, S., Hyodo, M., Orense, R.P., Dinesh, S. V., and Hyodo, T. (2008) Strain-dependent dynamic properties of remolded sand-clay mixtures. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 134(7), 972-981.
  55. Puzrin, A.M. and Shiran, A. (2000) Effects of the constitutive relationship on seismic response of soils. Part I. Constitutive modeling of cyclic behavior of soils. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 19(5), 305-318.
  56. Yoshida, N., Yasuda, S., Kiku, H., and Sawada, S. (2004) Laboratory test for deformation characteristics of sand under level 2 ground motion. 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering.
  57. Wang, G.X. and Kuwano, J. (1999) Modeling of strain dependency of shear modulus and damping of clayey sand. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 18(6), 463-471.
  58. Bayat, M. and Ghalandarzadeh, A. (2018) Stiffness degradation and damping ratio of sand-gravel mixtures under saturated state. International Journal of Civil Engineering, 16(10), 1261-1277.
  59. Bayat, M. and Ghalandarzadeh, A. (2019) Influence of depositional method on dynamic properties of granular soil. International Journal of Civil Engineering, 17(6), 907-920.