Investigation of the Seismic Behavior of the Rehabilitated Steel Frames through Asymmetrically Weakening of the Beam

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 Associate Professor, Earthquake Engineering Department, Civil Engineering Campus, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran

2 M.Sc. Graduate, Department of Civil Engineering of Semnan University, Semnan, Iran

3 Ph.D., Department of Civil Engineering of Semnan University, Semnan, Iran

Abstract

After the Northridge earthquake in 1994, numerous reports of failures due to brittle fractures of the weld joint for steel structures were presented in various Codes. One of the ideas to solve this problem was to promote the plastic hinge away from the weld through the intentional weakening of the beam at a certain distance from the column. In this idea, by weakening the top and bottom flanges of the beam at a certain distance from the column, the ductility of the connection is increased and brittle failure in the weld area is prevented. The existing steel frame buildings that are designed according to Pre-Northridge seismic provisions need to be rehabilitated to prevent the connections from experiencing brittle fracture at their welds. The presence of concrete slab in existing steel buildings imposes economic problems in retrofit projects. Asymmetrically weakening the beam is considered as an appropriate method for seismic rehabilitation of steel frame connections in which the rehabilitation action is conducted through intentional weakening the bottom flange of the beam and without the difficulty of removing concrete slab. Two techniques “reduction” and “heat induction” are among suggested methods for asymmetric weakening of the beam. In the “reduction” technique, the weakening action is conducted by cutting some parts of the beam bottom flange at a certain distance from the connection. In the “heat induction” technique, the weakening action is conducted by applying a special process of heating to the bottom flange of the beam at a certain distance from the column. In this heating process, which reduces the yield and ultimate strength by 35% and 25%, respectively, in other words the steel is annealed. This drop in strength in the heated area causes the plastic hinge to move over the beam.
The main purpose of this study is to investigate and compare the seismic behavior of low-, medium-, and high-rise 2-D steel frames improved through these two techniques “reduction” and “heat induction” under far-field and near-field earthquakes, numerically.
Two types of verification are conducted to ensure the accuracy of numerical modeling. First, 2-D rehabilitated connections through two “reduction” and “heat induction” techniques are verified with experimental results. Then, three 2-D frames are verified with Gupta & Krawinkler results.
The results of the frames analysis showed that inter-story drift and total rotation of rehabilitated frames by “reduction” technique were on average 15 percent more than rehabilitated frames by “heat induction” technique. This indicates the defect of the improved connection through the “reduction” technique in low elastic stiffness and torsional-lateral instability compared to the "heat application" technique. In addition, it was determined, as the height of the frame increases, the effectiveness of far-field earthquakes decreases and near field earthquakes show their effects on the structure more. As the ratio of the earthquake pulse period to the main period of the structure increases, the imposed deformation on the frames increase. So that, if this ratio is equal to one, the maximum relative drift for the frames is estimated.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. Engelhardt, M.D. and Husain, A.S. (1993) Cyclic-loading performance of welded flange-bolted web connections. Journal of Structural Engineering, 119(12), 3537-3550.
  2. Tremblay, R. and Filiatrault, A. (1997) Seismic performance of steel moment resisting frames retrofitted with a locally reduced beam section connection. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 24(1), 78-89.
  3. Morrison, M., Schweizer, D., and Hassan, T. (2015) An innovative seismic performance enhancement technique for steel building moment resisting connections. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 109, 34-46.
  4. Federal Emergency Management Agency (2006) Techniques for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings, FEMA-547.
  5. Kim, S.Y. and Lee, C.H. (2017) Seismic retrofit of welded steel moment connections with highly composite floor slabs. Journal of Constructional Steel Research139, 62-68.
  6. Bahirai, M. and Gerami, M. (2019) Seismic Rehabilitation of Steel Frame Connections Through Asymmetrically Weakening the Beam. International Journal of Steel Structures, 1-16.
  7. SAC (2000) FEMA-350: Recommended Seismic Design Criteria for New Steel Moment-Frame Buildings.
  8. Kim, K.D. and Engelhardt, M.D. (2007) Nonprismatic beam element for beams with RBS connections in steel moment frames. Journal of Structural Engineering133(2), 176-184.
  9. Kildashti, K. and Mirghaderi, R. (2009) Assessment of seismic behaviour of SMRFs with RBS connections by means of mixed-based state-space approach. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings18(5), 485-505.
  10. Han, S.W., Jung, J., Moon, K.H., and Kim, J.W. (2012) Experimental Evaluation of the Seismic Performance of WUF-W Moment Connections with a Modified Access Hole. Journal of the Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea16(6), 21-28.
  11. Federal Emergency Management Agency (2000) Recommended Post-Earthquake Evaluation and Repair Criteria for Welded Steel Moment-Frame Buildings (Vol. 352). SAC Joint Venture. Guidelines Development Committee and United States.
  12. Unified Building Code. UBC 94 1994.
  13. Federal Emergency Management Agency (2000) State of the Art Report on Systems Performance of Steel Moment Frames Subject to Earthquake Ground Shaking. FEMA 355C.
  14. Karlsson and Sorensen Inc. (1997) ABAQUS/PRE User Manual. Hibbit: Karlsson and Sorensen Inc.
  15. Gupta, A. and Krawinkler, H. (1998) Seismic Demands for the Performance Evaluation of Steel Moment Resisting Frame Structures. Doctoral Dissertation, Stanford University.
  16. SAC/BD-97/02. (1997) Protocol for fabrication, inspection, testing and documentation of beam-column connection tests and other experimental specimens. by Clark, P., Frank, K., Krawinkler, H., and Shaw, R.
  17. Applied Technology Council, and United States. Federal Emergency Management Agency (2009) Quantification of Building Seismic Performance Factors. US Department of Homeland Security, FEMA-P695.
  18. Bhandari, M., Bharti, S.D., and Shrimali, M.K. (2017) Behavior of Base Isolated Buildings Subjected To Near Field Earthquakes.
  19. Standard 2800 (2012) Building Design Code Against Earthquake, Fourth Edition (in Persian).
  20. Galesorkhi, R. and Gouchon, J. (2000) Near-source effects and correlation to recent recorded data. Proceedings of the 6th US National Conference on Earthquake Engineering.
  21. Manfredi G., Polese M., and Cozenza E. (2000) Cyclic demand in the near-fault area. Proceedings 6th US National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Seattle.
  22. American Society of Civil Engineers (2007) Seismic Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings (ASCE/SEI 41-06).