The Effect of the Near-Fault Velocity Pulse Type Ground Motions on the Response of Concrete Arch Dams (Case Study)

Document Type : Articles

Authors

Department of Civil Engineering, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran

Abstract

Because of the importance of the dam safety and to overcome the damages caused by the failure of the concrete dams under the earthquake, the seismic performance assessment of concrete dams needs more attention. This study deals with the investigation of the effect of the near-fault velocity pulse type ground motions and their effective parameters on the structural response. For this purpose, the Morrow Point arch dam has been considered as the case study. The dam is modeled in the SOLIDWORKS software and analyzed in the finite element ABAQUS software, considering the dynamic interaction of dam-reservoir-foundation and nonlinear behavior of concrete. In a nonlinear seismic analysis of dam-reservoir-foundation system, the crack propagation and the dam failure due to the low tension strength of concrete is necessary to be considered. Therefore, this study uses the concrete damage plasticity (CDP) model to consider the nonlinear behavior of concrete in tension and compression. Generally, near-fault ground motionshave short effective duration and contain long period pulses with big pulse amplitude. Three types of pulses have been introduced in the literature to show the velocity pulse type ground motions. Pulse A is a one-sided type (one half cycle pulse) thatresults in fling step in its displacement time history. Pulse type B represents for the forward directivity effects and contains a two-sided pulse (a pulse with two half cycles), which has a long period and amplitude in its velocity time history and its displacement time history includes just a one-sided pulse. Nevertheless, all the near-fault ground motions do not follow the forward directivity or fling step patterns; hence, another pulse type named C has been introduced. These pulses have at least three halfcycles in their velocity time histories, more than those of pulse types A and B. These pulses result in at least two half cycles in the displacement time history. In order to consider the effects of near-fault ground motions on the dam response, a collection of ground motions with B and C pulses in their velocity time histories have been selected and used in this study. For comparison purpose of the near-fault pulse like records, one should keep some of the effective parameters constant in the analysis process in order to study the effects of the other parameters. Unlike previous studies that only consider the peak ground acceleration (PGA) as the constant and common parameter of the records, the similar energy of the records is also taken into account in this study. The records are divided into two categories according to their specific energy density; so that, after scaling their PGA to 0.3 g, the specific energy densities of each category of the records are relatively similar. In the first group in which the maximum velocity, the Arias intensity and maximum displacement are relatively similar, the results indicate that the records which contain pulse type C, show more destructive responses. The difference is due to the shape nature (more half cycles) of this pulse type. In the second group, generally, the surveys also show more destructive responses of the records with pulse type C. Further investigations also present relatively much more effects of the "Arias Intensity" and "Pulse Duration” on the responseforthe records with relatively the same specific energy density. Besides, inthe case ofthe relatively the same values for the above-mentioned parameters, other parameters such as the maximum displacement are effective. The results of this study could be useful for the structures designed and constructed for the near-fault regions.

Keywords


  1. Karabulut, M., Kartal, M.E., Capar, O.F., and Cavusli, M. (2016) Earthquake analysis of concrete arch dams considering elastic foundation effects. Disaster Science and Engineering, 2(2), 46-52.
  2. Qiumei, H., Yaqi, L., Aiwen, L., Xiaojun, L. (2008) Seismic analysis of gravity dam subjected to near-field pulse-like ground motions. 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, October 12-17, 2008, Beijing, China.
  3. Malhotra, P.K. (1999) Response of buildings to near-field pulse-like ground motions. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 28(11), 1309-1326.
  4. Mavroeidis, G.P., Dong, G., Papageorgiou, A.S. (2004) Near‐fault ground motions, and the response of elastic and inelastic single‐degree‐of‐freedom (SDOF) systems. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 33(9), 1023-1049.
  5. Shen, J., Tsai, M.-H., Chang, K.-Ch., and Lee, G.C. (2004) Performance of a seismically isolated bridge under near-fault earthquake ground motions. Journal of Structural Engineering, 130(6), 861-868.
  6. Kalkan, E. and Kunnath, S.K. (2006) Effects of fling step and forward directivity on seismic response of buildings. Earthquake Spectra, 22(2), 367-390.
  7. Bayraktar, A., Altunişik, A.C., Sevim, B., Kartal, M.E., Türker, T., and Bilici, Y. (2009) Comparison of near-and far-fault ground motion effect on the nonlinear response of dam–reservoir–foundation systems. Nonlinear Dynamics, 58(4), 655-673.
  8. Champion, C. and Liel, A. (2012) The effect of near‐fault directivity on building seismic collapse risk. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 41(10), 1391-1409.
  9. Vafaei, D. and Eskandari, R. (2015) Seismic response of mega buckling‐restrained braces subjected to fling‐step and forward‐directivity near‐fault ground motions. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 24(9), 672-686.
  10. Huang, J. (2015) Earthquake damage analysis of concrete gravity dams: modeling and behavior under near-fault seismic excitations. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 19(7), 1037-1085.
  11. Uniform Building Code (1997) International Conference of Building Officials.Whittier, CA.
  12. Makris, N. and Chang, S.-P. (2000) Effect of viscous, viscoplastic and friction damping on the response of seismic isolated structures. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 29(1), 85-107.
  13. Makris, N. and Black, C.J. (2004) Dimensional analysis of rigid-plastic and elastoplastic structures under pulse-type excitations. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 130(9), 1006-1018.
  14. Alembagheri, M. and Ghaemian, M. (2013) Damage assessment of a concrete arch dam through nonlinear incremental dynamic analysis. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 44, 127-137.
  15. Lee, J. and Fenves, G.L. (1998) A plastic‐damage concrete model for earthquake analysis of dams. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 27(9), 937-956.
  16. Alembagheri, M. and Ghaemian, M. (2016) Seismic performance evaluation of a jointed arch dam. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 12(2), 256-274.
  17. Tang, Y. and Zhang, J. (2011) Response spectrum-oriented pulse identification and magnitude scaling of forward directivity pulses in near-fault ground motions. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 31(1), 59-76.
  18. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center. [Online]. Available: http://peer.berkeley.edu [2016, December].
  19. Shahi, S. and Baker, J. (2016) Pulse Classifications from NGA West2 database (2012, November 1-last update). [Online]. Available: http://web.stanford.edu [2016, September].
  20. Arias, A. (1970) A measure of earthquake intensity, in Seismic Design for Nuclear Power Plants. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 438–483.
  21. Liu, J.M., Wang, T., Wu, S.R., Gao, M.T. (2016) New Empirical Relationships between Arias Intensity and Peak Ground Acceleration. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 106(5), 2168-2176.
  22. Kwon, O.-S. and Kim, E. (2010) Case study: Analytical investigation on the failure of a two-story RC building damaged during the 2007 Pisco-Chincha earthquake. Engineering Structures, 32(7), 1876-1887.
  23. Liao, W.‐I., Loh, Ch.‐H., and Wan, Sh. (2001) Earthquake responses of RC moment frames subjected to near‐fault ground motions. The Structural Design of Tall Buildings, 10(3), 219-229.
  24. Zhang, S. and Wang, G. (2013) Effects of near-fault and far-fault ground motions on nonlinear dynamic response and seismic damage of concrete gravity dams. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 53, 217-229.